SPATIAL ECONOMETRIC MODELING IN THE MASS APPRAISAL OF REAL ESTATE: A GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION APPROACH (THE CASE OF TERMEZ CITY)

Authors

  • Khushvaktov Jasur Shukhrat ugli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21908436

Abstract

Although location is a decisive factor in determining real estate values, classical regression
models widely used in mass appraisal are based on the assumption of spatial independence among
observations. This study applies spatial econometric models that account for spatial dependence and
spatial heterogeneity—namely, the spatial autoregressive model (SAR), the spatial error model (SEM), and
geographically weighted regression (GWR)—to the mass appraisal of real estate. The empirical analysis is
based on the 2025 mass appraisal (cadastral) values of 13,116 apartments located in 380 multi-storey buildings
in the city of Termez, geocoded building coordinates, and GIS-based distances to social infrastructure facilities.
Strong spatial autocorrelation was detected in the residuals of the classical regression model (Moran’s I =
0.842; p < 0.001), confirming the relevance of spatial modeling. Among the models examined, the GWR
model demonstrated the best performance across all evaluation criteria: the coefficient of determination
increased from 0.90 to 0.94, MAPE decreased from 9.6% to 7.0%, and the coefficient of dispersion (COD)
declined from 9.6% to 7.1%. The spatial distribution of local coefficients revealed substantial variation in the
effects of building age and location-related factors across different city districts, providing a methodological
basis for the scientifically grounded delineation of price zones in cadastral valuation.

Keywords

mass appraisal, cadastral value, spatial econometrics, spatial autocorrelation, Moran’s I, geographically weighted regression (GWR), spatial autoregressive model (SAR), GIS, price zones, Termez City

Author Biography

Khushvaktov Jasur Shukhrat ugli

Independent Researcher, Termez State University
Tel.: +998 (99) 876-10-97

References

1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models / L. Anselin. – Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

2. Publishers, 1988. – 284 p.

3. Anselin L., Rey S.J. Modern Spatial Econometrics in Practice: A Guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL

4. / L. Anselin, S.J. Rey. – Chicago: GeoDa Press, 2014. – 394 p.

5. Bidanset P.E., Lombard J.R. The effect of kernel and bandwidth specification in geographically weighted

6. regression models on the accuracy and uniformity of mass real estate appraisal // Journal of Property Tax

7. Assessment & Administration. – 2014. – Vol. 10, No. 3. – P. 5–14.

8. Borst R.A., McCluskey W.J. Using geographically weighted regression to detect housing submarkets:

9. modeling large-scale spatial variations in value // Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration. –

10. – Vol. 5, No. 1. – P. 21–54.

11. Can A. Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models // Regional Science and Urban

12. Economics. – 1992. – Vol. 22, No. 3. – P. 453–474.

13. Cellmer R., Cichulska A., Bełej M. Spatial analysis of housing prices and market activity with the

14. geographically weighted regression // ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. – 2020. – Vol. 9,

15. No. 6. – Art. 380.

16. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-43 of March 5, 2025. On the implementation

17. of a mass real estate valuation system. – Tashkent: National Database of Legislation (LexUZ), 2025.

18. Dubin R.A. Predicting house prices using multiple listings data // Journal of Real Estate Finance and

19. Economics. – 1998. – Vol. 17, No. 1. – P. 35–59.

20. Eckert J.K. Property Appraisal and Assessment Administration / J.K. Eckert. – Chicago: International

21. Association of Assessing Officers, 1990. – 716 p.

22. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., Charlton M. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of

23. Spatially Varying Relationships / A.S. Fotheringham, C. Brunsdon, M. Charlton. – Chichester: Wiley, 2002.

24. – 269 p.

25. Huang B., Wu B., Barry M. Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatiotemporal

26. variation in house prices // International Journal of Geographical Information Science. – 2010.

27. – Vol. 24, No. 3. – P. 383–401.

28. IAAO. Standard on Ratio Studies / International Association of Assessing Officers. – Kansas City:

29. International Association of Assessing Officers, 2013. – 63 p.

30. Kelejian H.H., Prucha I.R. A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial

31. model // International Economic Review. – 1999. – Vol. 40, No. 2. – P. 509–533.

32. Khushvaktov J.Sh. Application of the Cobb-Douglas hybrid model for the mass appraisal of real estate

33. value. – Termez: TerSU, 2025.

34. Khushvaktov J.Sh. Innovative technologies of mass appraisal of real estate. – Termez: TerSU, 2025.

35. LeSage J., Pace R.K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics / J. LeSage, R.K. Pace. – Boca Raton: CRC

36. Press, 2009. – 374 p.

37. Lu B., Charlton M., Harris P., Fotheringham A.S. Geographically weighted regression with a non-Euclidean

38. distance metric: a case study using hedonic house price data // International Journal of Geographical

39. Information Science. – 2014. – Vol. 28, No. 4. – P. 660–681.

40. McCluskey W.J., McCord M., Davis P.T., Haran M., McIlhatton D. Prediction accuracy in mass appraisal: a

41. comparison of modern approaches // Journal of Property Research. – 2013. – Vol. 30, No. 4. – P. 239–265.

42. Rey S.J., Anselin L. PySAL: A Python library of spatial analytical methods // Handbook of Applied Spatial

43. Analysis. – Berlin: Springer, 2010. – P. 175–193.

44. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition // Journal of

45. Political Economy. – 1974. – Vol. 82, No. 1. – P. 34–55.

46. Tulakov U.T. Econometric modeling in real estate taxation and mass valuation // Advanced Economics and

47. Pedagogical Technologies. – 2025. – Vol. 2, No. 3. – P. 807–847.

48. Tulakov U.T. Strategic and methodological aspects of introducing a mass valuation system for real estate

49. in Uzbekistan // Economic Development and Analysis. – 2026. – Vol. 4, No. 1. – P. 223–228.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Khushvaktov , J. (2026). SPATIAL ECONOMETRIC MODELING IN THE MASS APPRAISAL OF REAL ESTATE: A GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION APPROACH (THE CASE OF TERMEZ CITY). ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(8), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21908436
Vol. 3 No. 8 (2026): Social, economic, scientific and technical academic journal