FINANCIAL AND DIGITAL FACTORS OF INNOVATIVE OUTPUT IN UZBEKISTAN’S SOCIAL SECTOR: ECONOMETRIC EVIDENCE FOR 2007–2025

Authors

  • Jakhongir Salimbek ugli Kholmuratov Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Tashkent state university of economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22773343

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between financial, investment, and digital factors and innovative output in Uzbekistan’s social sector during 2007–2025. The empirical framework considers the volume of innovative products and services as the dependent variable and innovation financing, government social expenditure, non-budgetary investment, management digitalization, and digital-platform implementation as explanatory variables. A log-linear multiple regression model is specified and estimated using annual observations. The dissertation-based econometric results report a coefficient of determination of R² = 0.9223, indicating that the included variables jointly account for a substantial share of variation in innovative output. Innovation financing demonstrates the largest reported elasticity, while digital-platform implementation also exhibits a strong positive association. The overall model is statistically significant according to the reported F-test. For journal-level reproducibility, the study additionally emphasizes diagnostic procedures including multicollinearity testing, residual autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity, model specification, stationarity, and forecast-error measurement. A replication check indicates that some statistics obtained directly from the tabulated annual series require reconciliation with the reported EViews output before final submission. The findings underline a broader strategic implication: sustainable innovation in the social sector depends not only on higher public expenditure but on the interaction between dedicated innovation financing, digital infrastructure, management capacity, institutional quality, and effective deployment of digital platforms. The study provides a reproducible methodological framework for future regional and sector-level analyses.

Keywords

innovative output, social sector, innovation financing, digital transformation, digital platforms, econometric modelling, public expenditure, Uzbekistan

References

Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2018). Public Innovation and Social Innovation in the Public Sector. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987.

Lopes, A. V., & Farias, J. S. (2022). How can governance support collaborative innovation in the public sector? A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(1).

Nguyen, H., Drejer, I., & Marques, P. (2024). Citizen engagement in public sector innovation: Exploring the transition between paradigms. Public Management Review, 26(12), 3622–3642.

OECD. (2024). OECD Public Governance Reviews: Uzbekistan: Towards a More Modern, Effective and Strategic Public Administration. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2025). Digital Government Review of Korea: Harnessing Digital and Data to Transform Government. OECD Publishing.

Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024. Geneva: WIPO.

World Bank. (2024). Human Capital for More Jobs: Connecting People to Work and Creating Entrepreneurs.

National Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Statistical indicators on innovation, education, healthcare, social protection and services, 2007–2025.

Ministry of Digital Technologies of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2026). Digital Government: New Quality and New Pace in Public Services at a New Stage.

Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Law No. LRU-630 “On Innovation Activity”. https://lex.uz/docs/5155423

Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). Presidential Decree UP-165 “On Approval of the Innovation Development Strategy of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2022–2026”. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/7569176

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Klapper, L. (2012). Measuring Financial Inclusion: The Global Findex Database. Policy Research Working Papers, No. 6025. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6025 Cited by: 2416

Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452 Cited by: 4271

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15

How to Cite

Kholmuratov, J. S. ugli. (2026). FINANCIAL AND DIGITAL FACTORS OF INNOVATIVE OUTPUT IN UZBEKISTAN’S SOCIAL SECTOR: ECONOMETRIC EVIDENCE FOR 2007–2025. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(9), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22773343
Vol. 3 No. 9 (2026): Social, economic, scientific and technical academic journal