DEVELOPMENT OF A HOUSEHOLD WELFARE INDEX UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE SHADOW ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22803807Abstract
This study examines the measurement of household welfare in economies where informal income plays a significant role. Conventional income-based indicators often underestimate actual living standards because income from informal activities and in-kind transactions is rarely captured in official statistics. The study reviews key theoretical approaches to welfare measurement and proposes a composite Household Welfare Index (HWI) that integrates household consumption, housing conditions, ownership of durable assets, and access to basic services, while incorporating an adjustment for informality based on the gap between reported income and actual consumption. Using data from Uzbekistan for 2021–2025, the findings indicate that the adjusted index yields higher estimates of household welfare and lower poverty rates than conventional income-based measures, particularly among low-income households. The results suggest that composite indicators based on consumption and asset ownership provide a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of household welfare in economies with a substantial informal sector.Keywords
household welfare, shadow economy, multidimensional poverty index, informal income, consumption-based welfare measurement, UzbekistanReferences
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S., Foster, J. (2011). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.
Deaton, A. (1997). The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. World Bank / Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pissarides, C. A., Weber, G. (1989). An Expenditure-Based Estimate of Britain’s Black Economy. Journal of Public Economics, 39(1), 17–32.
Schneider, F., Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77–114.
Feige, E. L. (1990). Defining and Estimating Underground and Informal Economies: The New Institutional Economics Approach. World Development, 18(7), 989–1002.
World Bank. Multidimensional Poverty Measures: Methodology and Country Data. World Bank.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index Reports. https://hdr.undp.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
