DEVELOPMENT OF A HOUSEHOLD WELFARE INDEX UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE SHADOW ECONOMY

Authors

  • Nursultan Nugmatillaevich Afenov Tashkent State University of Economics Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22803807

Abstract

This study examines the measurement of household welfare in economies where informal income plays a significant role. Conventional income-based indicators often underestimate actual living standards because income from informal activities and in-kind transactions is rarely captured in official statistics. The study reviews key theoretical approaches to welfare measurement and proposes a composite Household Welfare Index (HWI) that integrates household consumption, housing conditions, ownership of durable assets, and access to basic services, while incorporating an adjustment for informality based on the gap between reported income and actual consumption. Using data from Uzbekistan for 2021–2025, the findings indicate that the adjusted index yields higher estimates of household welfare and lower poverty rates than conventional income-based measures, particularly among low-income households. The results suggest that composite indicators based on consumption and asset ownership provide a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of household welfare in economies with a substantial informal sector.

Keywords

household welfare, shadow economy, multidimensional poverty index, informal income, consumption-based welfare measurement, Uzbekistan

References

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

Alkire, S., Foster, J. (2011). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.

Deaton, A. (1997). The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. World Bank / Johns Hopkins University Press.

Pissarides, C. A., Weber, G. (1989). An Expenditure-Based Estimate of Britain’s Black Economy. Journal of Public Economics, 39(1), 17–32.

Schneider, F., Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77–114.

Feige, E. L. (1990). Defining and Estimating Underground and Informal Economies: The New Institutional Economics Approach. World Development, 18(7), 989–1002.

World Bank. Multidimensional Poverty Measures: Methodology and Country Data. World Bank.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index Reports. https://hdr.undp.org

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

How to Cite

Afenov, N. N. (2026). DEVELOPMENT OF A HOUSEHOLD WELFARE INDEX UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE SHADOW ECONOMY. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(8), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22803807
Vol. 3 No. 8 (2026): Social, economic, scientific and technical academic journal