ECONOMIC MECHANISMS OF INVESTMENT ACTIVITY IN ENSURING THE COMPETITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRY ENTERPRISES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22822050Abstract
This paper examines the economic mechanisms through which investment activity is directed toward the competitive development of Uzbekistan’s light industry — textiles, knitwear, footwear, leather, and silk-weaving — during the period 2024–2026. Drawing on presidential decrees, Tax Code provisions, official export statistics, and enterprise-level case evidence, the paper maps three families of mechanisms — concessional credit, targeted tax incentives, and special economic zone infrastructure — established under Presidential Decree No. DP-174 of September 2025 and Presidential Decree No. DP-4 of January 2026, and evaluates their association with the sector’s competitiveness outcomes. Between 2024 and 2025, the textile industry’s exports were estimated at USD 3.0 billion in 2024 and USD 2.5–2.6 billion in finished and semi-finished products in 2025 (sources differ on the precise 2025 figure), foreign direct investment into the sector reached USD 2.1 billion in 2025, and the number of exporting enterprises grew to 1,409, of which 502 were new entrants generating USD 203.0 million in first-year exports. Enterprises supplying international brands such as LC Waikiki, Inditex, and The North Face exported 42 percent of their 2024 output by value, a substantially higher export-orientation ratio than the sector average, and generated more than 37,500 jobs. The paper argues that the sector’s post-2025 institutional architecture — a dedicated development agency, an offbudget support fund, a temporary 2 percent corporate income tax regime for qualifying manufacturers, and free economic zone incentives requiring as little as USD 3 million in qualifying investment — represents a coherent and evolving application of location-advantage and cluster-based competitiveness theory to a specific industrial sector, and identifies the government’s USD 7 billion export target for 2028 as the benchmark against which the effectiveness of these mechanisms should next be assessed.Keywords
investment activity, light industry, competitiveness, textile industry, tax incentives, special economic zones, foreign direct investment, industrial policy, Uzbekistan, export developmentReferences
Parmanova, R., , B. P. G., & Qudratov, I. (2026). FINANCING SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN UZBEKISTAN AND INDONESIA: CHALLENGES OF CONVENTIONAL LENDING AND THE POTENTIAL OF THE ISLAMIC PARTNERSHIP (MUSHARAKAH) MODEL. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20079283
Nazarov, G. (2026). THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL BRANDING ON THE FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF HEIS: EVIDENCE FROM THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN UZBEKISTAN. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20152393
Khojamqulov, J. (2026). METHODOLOGICAL ALIGNMENT OF THE VALUATION OF MOVABLE PROPERTY FOR LOAN COLLATERAL PURPOSES WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(5), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21425637
Камбарова, Ш. (2026). ВНЕДРЕНИЕ ПРИОРИТЕТНЫХ НАПРАВЛЕНИЙ ПОДДЕРЖКИ ИННОВАЦИОННОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ С УЧЁТОМ ЗАРУБЕЖНОГО ОПЫТА В МАЛОМ И СРЕДНЕМ БИЗНЕСЕ УЗБЕКИСТАНА. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20966396
Djumaniyazova, M. (2026). THE IMPORTANCE OF USING MODERN APPROACHES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF BUSINESS PROCESSES OF TEXTILE ENTERPRISES. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21099713
Rajabov, S. (2026). A SYSTEM OF INTERNAL AUDIT PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC PROCUREMENT (BASED ON INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS). ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(6), 878–884. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21533384
Yuldashov, A. (2026). ENDOGENOUS GROWTH FACTORS IN THE SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGIONS OF UZBEKISTAN: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(7), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21485271
Misirov, A. (2026). RISK-BASED METHODOLOGY FOR CALCULATING MATERIALITY IN INTERNAL AUDITS OF BUDGETARY ORGANIZATIONS. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21177680
Mulayev, F. (2026). IMPROVING THE INTERNAL AUDIT OF FINANCIAL ERRORS AND IRREGULARITIES IN BUDGET ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH A RISK-BASED APPROACH. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(8), 428–433. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22094728
Shokirov, F. (2026). INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN ROAD SECTOR FINANCING AND ROAD ASSET MANAGEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN UZBEKISTAN. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(8), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21806826
Tleuov, N. (2026). THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FOOD INDUSTRY. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(7), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21288349
Ibragimov, N. (2026). CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF THE AUDIT OF COMMERCIAL BANKSʻ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FORMATION OF KEY AUDIT MATTERS (ISA 701). ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21040813
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-09-18 (2)
- 2026-09-18 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
