TRANSPARENCY, SINGLE BIDDING, AND BUDGET SAVINGS IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Akhmedjanov Sardorbek Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22980947

Abstract

This study examines which institutional and market factors are associated with budget savings in public procurement across the regions of Uzbekistan. A balanced regional framework was constructed for 14 territorial units over 2019–2024, yielding 84 region-year observations. The dependent variable is the budget-saving rate, measured as the percentage difference between planned and contracted procurement expenditure. Eight explanatory variables capture electronic procurement, participation by small and medium-sized enterprises, publication openness, bidder intensity, single-bid contracting, procurement-cycle duration, staff qualification, and the use of framework agreements. A regional fixedeffects model is estimated to isolate within-country variation while controlling for time-invariant regional characteristics.

Keywords

public procurement, transparency, single bidding, budget savings, e-procurement, SMEs, Uzbekistan

References

1. Bandiera, O., Prat, A., & Valletti, T. (2009). Active and passive waste in government spending: Evidence from a policy experiment. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1278–1308. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1278

2. Bosio, E., Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., & Shleifer, A. (2022). Public procurement in law and practice. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1091–1117. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200738

3. Branzoli, N., & Decarolis, F. (2015). Entry and subcontracting in public procurement auctions. Management Science, 61(12), 2945–2962. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2071

4. Chiappinelli, O. (2020). Decentralization and public procurement performance: New evidence from Italy. Economic Inquiry, 58(2), 856–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12871

5. Coviello, D., Guglielmo, A., & Spagnolo, G. (2018). The effect of discretion on procurement performance. Management Science, 64(2), 715–738. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2628

6. Coviello, D., & Mariniello, M. (2014). Publicity requirements in public procurement: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Public Economics, 109, 76–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jpubeco.2013.10.008

7. Decarolis, F. (2014). Awarding price, contract performance, and bids screening: Evidence from procurement auctions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 108–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/ app.6.1.108

8. Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering high-level corruption: Cross-national objective corruption risk indicators using public procurement data. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 155–164. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000461

9. Hoekman, B., & Taş, B. K. O. (2022). Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing. Small Business Economics, 58(1), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00414-z

10. Lewis-Faupel, S., Neggers, Y., Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2016). Can electronic procurement improve infrastructure provision? Evidence from public works in India and Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140258

11. OECD. (2015). Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement (OECD/LEGAL/0411). OECD Legal Instruments. Official OECD source

12. OECD/SIGMA. (2011). Public Procurement Brief 19: Framework Agreements. SIGMA Programme, OECD and European Union. Official OECD/SIGMA source

13. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021). Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. LRU-684 of 22 April 2021 “On Public Procurement”. National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. LexUZ official source

14. Uzbek Republican Commodity Exchange (UZEX). (2019–2024). Public Procurement Electronic System: Regional procurement records and administrative statistics. Official public procurement electronic system

15. Statistics Agency under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2019–2024). Regional socioeconomic and business statistics. National Statistics System. Official statistics portal

Downloads

Published

2026-09-26

How to Cite

Sardorbek, A. (2026). TRANSPARENCY, SINGLE BIDDING, AND BUDGET SAVINGS IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(9), 828–833. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22980947
Vol. 3 No. 9 (2026): Social, economic, scientific and technical academic journal