ECONOMIC-GEOGRAPHICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CITIES AND URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS IN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23260385Abstract
This article examines the economic-geographical significance of cities and urban agglomerations in regional development, with particular attention to the spatial concentration of population and economic activity, the expansion of labor and service markets, and the influence of cities on surrounding territories. The theoretical foundations of agglomeration economies and urban development are analyzed based on international scientific literature. The study employs economic-geographical comparison, statistical analysis, spatial concentration analysis, and accessibility assessment approaches. Using Uzbekistan as an empirical case, the study compares Tashkent City and Tashkent Region, Samarkand Region, and the Fergana Valley. The results demonstrate that large cities serve as important centers of population concentration, economic activity, industry, and services, while the diffusion of agglomeration effects to surrounding territories depends on transport, economic, and functional linkages. The study identifies priority directions for strengthening territorial integration, infrastructure development, and economic linkages within urban agglomerations in Uzbekistan.Keywords
city, urban agglomeration, regional development, economic geography, urbanization, economic concentration, territorial integration, accessibility, polycentricity, infrastructureReferences
1. Ahlfeldt, G. M. (2015). The economics of density: evidence from the Berlin Wall / G.M. Ahlfeldt, S.J. Redding, D.M. Sturm, N. Wolf. Econometrica, 83(6), 2127–2189. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA10876
2. Burger, M. J. (2012). Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity / M.J. Burger, E.J. Meijers. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1127–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011407095
3. Castells-Quintana, D. (2017). Malthus living in a slum: urban concentration, infrastructure and economic growth / D. Castells-Quintana. Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
4. Chauvin, J. P. (2017). What is different about urbanization in rich and poor countries? Cities in Brazil, China, India and the United States / J.P. Chauvin, E. Glaeser, Y. Ma, K. Tobio. Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 17–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.05.003
5. Combes, P. (2012). -P. The productivity advantages of large cities: distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection / P.-P. Combes, G. Duranton, L. Gobillon, D. Puga, S. Roux. Econometrica, 80(6), 2543–2594. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8442
6. Duranton, G. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies / G. Duranton, D. Puga. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2063–2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-
7. Frick, S. A. (2018). Change in urban concentration and economic growth / S.A. Frick, A. Rodríguez-Pose. World Development, 105, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.034
8. Fujita, M. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade / M. Fujita, P. Krugman, A.J. Venables. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001
9. Glaeser, E. L. (2010). The complementarity between cities and skills / E.L. Glaeser, M.G. Resseger. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00635.x
10. Grover, A. (2023). Agglomeration economies in developing countries: a meta-analysis / A. Grover, S.V. Lall, J. Timmis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j
11. OECD / European Commission. Cities in the World: A New Perspective on Urbanisation. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020. – 171 p. – DOI: 10.1787/d0efcbda-en.
12. Puga, D. (2010). The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies / D. Puga. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00657.x
13. Wang, X. (2023). How do urban agglomerations drive economic development? A policy implementation and spatial effects perspective / X. Wang, Y. Yang, Y. Hou, S. Dai. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 1224–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.10.014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.