IMPROVING FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING OPERATIONAL RISKS IN COMMERCIAL BANKS IN UZBEKISTAN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23367964

Abstract

This study examines the financial mechanisms employed by commercial banks in Uzbekistan to assess and mitigate operational risks, drawing on the Basel Committee’s operational risk framework and institutional economics theory. Using official data from the Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU), the IMF–World Bank Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), and government-reported statistics on cybercrime and financial fraud, the study develops an Operational Risk Assessment and Resilience Index (ORARI). The index incorporates three indicators—return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and the number of banks assessed under the CBU’s Guidelines on Risk-Based Supervision (GRBS)—weighted using the coefficientof-variation method. The analysis covers three reference years: 2015, 2023, and 2024. The index increased from 0.126 in 2015 (classified as “Very Low,” before the introduction of risk-based supervision) to 0.400 in 2023 (classified as “Medium,” when the GRBS pilot covered four banks) and reached 0.993 in 2024 (classified as “Very High,” following the expansion of GRBS coverage to 14 banks). These developments coincide with improvements in banking-sector profitability, with ROA increasing from 1.71% to approximately 1.9–2.0% and ROE from 13.35% to approximately 17.1–17.9%, alongside the expansion of formal risk-based supervisory assessments. The findings highlight the importance of integrating financial performance indicators with supervisory coverage measures to monitor the development of operational risk assessment and institutional resilience in Uzbekistan’s banking sector.

Keywords

operational risk, risk-based supervision, commercial banks, Basel framework, cyberfraud, capital adequacy, coefficient of variation, composite index

References

1. Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Regulation No. 3427 “On Requirements for the Risk Management System of Banks and Banking Groups”. – Tashkent, 18 April 2023.

2. Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Regulation No. 466 “On Requirements Imposed by the Central Bank to Internal Regulations of Commercial Banks”. – Tashkent, 22 February 2000.

3. Bank Policy Institute. A Modification to the Basel Committee’s Standardized Approach to Operational Risk. – Washington, DC: BPI, 2022.

4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: Finalising Post-Crisis Reforms. – Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2017.

5. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework (Basel II). – Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2006.

6. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk. – Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2011 (revised 2021).

7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Sound Practices for the Management and Supervision of Operational Risk. – Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2003.

8. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Standardised Approach for Operational Risk (OPE25) [Electronic resource]. (2024). Basel Framework.

9. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Enterprise Risk Management — Integrating with Strategy and Performance. – Durham, NC: COSO, 2017.

10. International Monetary Fund; World Bank. Republic of Uzbekistan: Financial Sector Assessment Program — Detailed Assessment of Observance of the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision. – Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2025. – IMF Country Report No. 25/227.

11. OECD. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008.

12. Power, M. (2005). The Invention of Operational Risk. Review of International Political Economy, 12(4), 577–599.

13. Tokhtabaev, A. (2025). Capital Adequacy and Risk Management in Uzbekistan’s Banking Sector: Trends and Perspectives. The Peerian Journal, 38, 17–21.

14. UzDaily.uz. Uzbekistan’s Central Bank Updates Regulations on Banking System Risks: What Has Changed? [Electronic resource]. – 1 February 2025. – URL: https://www.uzdaily.uz/en/uzbekistans-centralbank-updates-regulations-on-banking-system-risks-what-has-changed/.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

Faxritdin, T. (2026). IMPROVING FINANCIAL MECHANISMS FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING OPERATIONAL RISKS IN COMMERCIAL BANKS IN UZBEKISTAN. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(10), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23367964
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2026): Social, economic, scientific and technical academic journal