INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL BANKS’ ECONOMIC SECURITY: RISK-BASED EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Shavkat Makhramovich Uralov Tashkent State University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23495460

Abstract

This study develops and critically evaluates an integrated framework for assessing the economic security of commercial banks in Uzbekistan. Going beyond conventional solvency measures, the proposed framework incorporates internal financial resilience, exposure to external environmental risks, corporate governance, regulatory compliance, and digital and operational threats. The findings suggest that composite economic security ratings can serve as effective tools for risk prioritization when supported by clearly defined indicators, sensitivity analysis, and independently validated early-warning signals.

Keywords

economic security, commercial banks, Uzbekistan, composite indicators, liquidity risk, Basel III, stress testing, financial stability, early warning

References

1. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems [Electronic resource]. – Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2011. – URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.htm.

2. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Liquidity Risk Monitoring Tools [Electronic resource]. – Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2013. – URL: https:// www.bis.org/publ/bcbs238.pdf.

3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision [Electronic resource]. – Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2024. – URL: https://www.bis.org/ publications/202404-standards-core-principles-effective-banking-supervision.

4. Berger, A. N. (2013). How Does Capital Affect Bank Performance During Financial Crises? / A. N. Berger, C. H. S. Bouwman. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 146–176.

5. Betz, F. (2014). Predicting Distress in European Banks / F. Betz, S. Oprică, T. A. Peltonen, P. Sarlin. Journal of Banking & Finance, 45, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.041

6. Box, G. E. P. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control / G. E. P. Box, G. M. Jenkins, G. C. Reinsel, G. M. Ljung. Wiley.

7. Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity / M. K. Brunnermeier, L. H. Pedersen. Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2201–2238. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn098

8. Diamond, D. W. (1983). Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity / D. W. Diamond, P. H. Dybvig. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1086/261155

9. Freixas, X. (2008). Microeconomics of Banking / X. Freixas, J.-C. Rochet. MIT Press.

10. Laeven, L. (2009). Bank Governance, Regulation and Risk Taking / L. Laeven, R. Levine. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.003

11. OECD; Joint Research Centre. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en.

12. Uralov, S. M. (2026). Improving the Practice of Ensuring the Economic Security of Commercial Banks: PhD Dissertation Abstract / S. M. Uralov; Tashkent State University of Economics.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-20

How to Cite

Uralov, S. M. (2026). INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL BANKS’ ECONOMIC SECURITY: RISK-BASED EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(10), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23495460
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2026): Social, economic, scientific and technical academic journal