ENHANCING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM: INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS AND INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES

Authors

  • Sardorbek Ravshanovich Kurbonbekov Independent Researcher, Tashkent International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23699855

Abstract

This article investigates how institutional design, competitive conditions, procurement professionalism, contract management, and strategic purchasing influence the efficiency of the public procurement system in Uzbekistan. Rather than treating digitalization as the primary focus of analysis, the study examines it as an enabling component within a broader performance management framework. The research combines legal and institutional analysis, comparative benchmarking of the Republic of Korea, Chile, and the European Union, an analysis of Uzbekistan’s 2025 baseline indicators and 2030 policy targets, and a performance-oriented evaluation framework. The study identifies four mutually reinforcing drivers of efficiency: effective competition and market access; value for money and comprehensive contract management throughout the procurement cycle; professional capacity, integrity, and accountability; and strategic and sustainable procurement. On this basis, a Public Procurement Efficiency Index (PPEI) and a key performance indicator (KPI) dashboard are proposed to link pre-award competition with post-award delivery, cost control, and strategic outcomes. The analysis concludes that sustainable efficiency improvements require stronger market design, greater professionalization, disciplined contract execution, and systematic performance evaluation, supported—but not replaced—by digital infrastructure.

Keywords

public procurement efficiency, institutional reform, value for money, competition, contract management, procurement professionalization, performance measurement, strategic procurement, life-cycle costing, Uzbekistan

References

1. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 26.12.2025-yildagi “Davlat xaridlari tizimida raqobat muhiti va shaffoflikni taʼminlash boʻyicha navbatdagi chora-tadbirlar toʻgʻrisida”gi PF-259-sonli Farmoni, https://lex. uz/uz/docs/-7952218

2. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 04.02.2026-yildagi “Mahalliy ishlab chiqarish va sanoat kooperatsiyasini yangi tizim asosida rivojlantirish boʻyicha birinchi navbatdagi chora-tadbirlar toʻgʻrisida”gi PF-17-sonli Farmoni, https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-8037362

3. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining 20.12.2024-yildagi “2025 — 2027-yillarda davlat xaridlari tizimini takomillashtirish va rivojlantirish strategiyasini tasdiqlash toʻgʻrisida”gi 865-sonli qarori,

4. Ministry of Economy and Finance of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Measures to Improve the System of Supporting Green Public Procurement [Electronic resource]. – 18 June 2025.

5. Bandiera, O., Prat, A., & Valletti, T. (2009). Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1278–1308. https://doi.org/10.1257/

6. European Commission. eForms: Digital Standard Forms for Public Procurement Notices [Electronic resource] / Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. – Current guidance.

7. Lewis-Faupel, S., Neggers, Y., Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2016). Can Electronic Procurement Improve Infrastructure Provision? Evidence from Public Works in India and Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140258

8. OECD. Government at a Glance 2025: Integration of Public Procurement with Public Financial Management. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025.

9. OECD. Implementing the OECD Recommendation on Public Procurement in OECD and Partner Countries. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025.

10. OECD. Maximising the Benefits of Effective Competition in Public Procurement in Slovenia. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025.

11. OECD. Public Procurement in Chile: Policy Options for Efficient and Inclusive Framework Agreements. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. – (OECD Public Governance Reviews).

12. OECD. Public Procurement Performance: A Framework for Measuring Efficiency, Compliance and Strategic Goals. – 2023. – No. 36. – (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers).

13. OECD. Recommendation of the Council on Public Procurement. – 2015. – (OECD Legal Instruments).

14. OECD. The Korean Public Procurement Service: Innovating for Effectiveness. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016. – (OECD Public Governance Reviews).

15. Open Contracting Partnership. Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS): Data Standard and Implementation Guidance [Electronic resource]. – Current edition.

16. World Bank. Uzbekistan Country Partnership Framework for FY2022–FY2026. – Washington, DC: World Bank, 2022.

17. World Bank. Uzbekistan Institutional Capacity Building Project: Implementation Support Mission Aide-Mémoire. – April 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Kurbonbekov, S. R. (2026). ENHANCING THE EFFICIENCY OF THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM: INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS AND INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(10), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23699855
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2026): Social, economic, scientific and technical academic journal