ADVANTAGES OF IMPLEMENTING AN OCCUPATIONAL AND SKILLS MAPPING SYSTEM IN UZBEKISTAN’S LABOUR MARKET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20720528Abstract
This article examines the advantages of implementing a systematic occupational and skills
mapping framework in Uzbekistan’s labour market. The study is based on a comparative analysis of internationally
recognised systems, including O*NET (USA), the German Dual Qualification Reference Framework (BIBB/
DQR), the Russian Atlas of Professions, and Kazakhstan’s National Qualifications System. Using statistical
analysis of Uzbekistan’s labour market indicators for 2019–2024 and a structured review of European, CIS,
and Uzbek scholarly literature, the study identifies five key institutional gaps and proposes six evidence-based
policy interventions. The findings indicate that a well-designed and digitally integrated occupational mapping
platform, aligned with the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and based on the existing XALIKK-2020
national classifier, can reduce skill-job mismatches by up to 25%, increase formal employment by 8–12%, and
significantly improve the international recognition and exportability of Uzbek qualifications.
Keywords
occupational mapping, skills framework, XALIKK-2020, O*NET, EQF, BIBB/DQR, qualifications system, labour market institutions, competency-based assessment.References
1. Bohlinger, S. (2012). Qualifications frameworks and the transferability of qualifications in transition
2. economies. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(3), 307–321.
3. Cedefop. (2022). European Skills and Jobs Survey: Measuring Skill Mismatch across EU Labour
4. Markets. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
5. Euler, D. (2013). Germany’s Dual Vocational Training System: A Model for Other Countries? Gütersloh:
6. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
7. Schmidt, G., & Tergeist, P. (2011). Occupational information systems and labour productivity: Crossnational
8. evidence. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 124. Paris: OECD.
9. Winterton, J., & Delamare-Le Deist, F. (2005). Typology of Knowledge, Skills and Competences:
10. Clarification of the Concept and Prototype. Cedefop Reference Series 64. Luxembourg: OPOCE.
11. Abdrakhmanova, G. I., & Gokhberg, L. M. (2022). Digital Transformation and Labour Market Futures in
12. Central Asia. Moscow: HSE Publishing House.
13. Kapelyushnikov, R. I. (2019). Skill mismatch in the Russian labour market: Measurement, dynamics
14. and determinants. Russian Journal of Economics, 5(3), 273–298.
15. Luksha, P., Peskov, D., & Luksha, M. (2015). Atlas of New Professions 2.0. Moscow: Agency for
16. Strategic Initiatives / SKOLKOVO.
17. Makhkamova, Z. R. (2023). Qualification recognition barriers and labour migration costs in Central
18. Asia. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 44–62.
19. Sorokin, P., & Froumin, I. (2021). Sector skills councils and qualifications reform in Kazakhstan: Lessons
20. for the CIS region. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 2(28), 18–26.
21. Nazarov, B. M. (2021). Vocational Education Legislation in Post-Reform Uzbekistan: Achievements
22. and Implementation Gaps. Tashkent: Fan va texnologiyalar.
23. Rakhimov, S. A. (2022). Digital labour exchange platforms and occupational taxonomy requirements in
24. Uzbekistan. Iqtisodiyot va tadbirkorlik, 4(141), 88–96.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.