IMPROVING AUDIT SAMPLING EFFICIENCY THROUGH RISK-BASED STRATIFICATION IN THE INTERNAL AUDIT OF BUDGETARY ORGANIZATIONS

Authors

  • Muqumov Jasur Bosimovich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21177736

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of improving audit sampling efficiency by stratifying the audited
population according to the economic classification of expenditures and risk zones in the audit of budgetary
organizations. The research problem is that the widely used “fixed-percentage” approach ignores the risk
level of expenditures. The study applies a systematic approach, grouping methods, a risk matrix, scoring, and
conditional modelling. As a result, a six-stage methodology is developed that systematically combines risk
analysis with stratification. The author’s scientific contribution lies in substantiating a methodology adapted to
public audit criteria, in which the risk level, rather than value alone, is used as the main stratification criterion.

Keywords

audit sampling, stratification, risk zone, risk matrix, budgetary organization, economic classification of expenditures, sampling efficiency, public audit, ISA 530, ISSAI 1530.

Author Biography

Muqumov Jasur Bosimovich

Researcher, Tashkent State University of Economics

References

1. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 26.05.2026-yildagi “ Kichik biznes subyektlarining oʻsishi uchun

2. yanada qulay iqtisodiy va maʼmuriy shart-sharoitlar yaratish toʻgʻrisida” PF-100-sonli Farmoni https://lex.uz/uz/

3. docs/-8236831

4. Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2020). Auditing and Assurance Services: An

5. Integrated Approach (17th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

6. Christensen, B. E., Elder, R. J., & Glover, S. M. (2015). Behind the numbers: Insights into large audit firm

7. sampling policies. Accounting Horizons, 29(1), 61–81.

8. Elder, R. J., Akresh, A. D., Glover, S. M., Higgs, J. L., & Liljegren, J. (2013). Audit sampling research:

9. A synthesis and implications for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1),

10. –129.

11. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2023). International Standard on

12. Auditing (ISA) 530: Audit Sampling. In Handbook of International Quality Management, Auditing, Review, Other

13. Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. New York: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

14. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). (2020). ISSAI 1530: Audit Sampling;

15. ISSAI 100: Fundamental Principles of Public-Sector Auditing. Vienna: INTOSAI.

16. Leslie, D. A., Teitlebaum, A. D., & Anderson, R. J. (1979). Dollar-Unit Sampling: A Practical Guide for

17. Auditors. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman.

18. Neter, J., & Loebbecke, J. K. (1975). Behavior of Major Statistical Estimators in Sampling Accounting

19. Populations: An Empirical Study. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Muqumov , J. (2026). IMPROVING AUDIT SAMPLING EFFICIENCY THROUGH RISK-BASED STRATIFICATION IN THE INTERNAL AUDIT OF BUDGETARY ORGANIZATIONS. ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21177736
Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): Social, economic, scientific and technical academic journal