STATISTICAL MODEL FOR DETERMINING SAMPLE SIZE IN THE AUDIT OF BUDGETARY ORGANIZATIONS BASED ON AUDIT RISK, MATERIALITY, AND EXPECTED MISSTATEMENT

Authors

  • Jasur Bosimovich Muqumov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21412329

Keywords:

sample size, statistical model, audit risk, materiality, expected misstatement, monetary unit sampling, Poisson distribution, confidence factor, budgetary organization, ISA 530.

Abstract

This article presents a statistical and mathematical model for determining sample size in audits
of budgetary organizations by establishing the interrelationship among audit risk, materiality, and expected
misstatement. The research problem is that, in practice, sample size is often determined using a fixedpercentage
approach without adequately considering audit risk, materiality, and expected misstatement. The
study employs monetary unit sampling methodology, the Poisson distribution, hypothetical modelling, and
sensitivity analysis. As a result, a model was developed that systematically accounts for expected misstatement
and applies differentiated parameters across risk zones. The author’s scientific contribution lies in adapting the
model to the specific characteristics of the budgetary sector and integrating it with a risk-based stratification
methodology.

Author Biography

Jasur Bosimovich Muqumov

Independent Researcher at Tashkent State University of Economics

References

Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-100 dated July 10, 2024, “On Additional

Measures to Strengthen Financial Control over the Use of Budgetary Funds” // National Database of

Legislation. — July 12, 2024. — No. 06/24/100/0502. https://lex.uz/docs/7015258

Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-21 dated February 16, 2026, “On Additional

Measures to Consistently Continue Reforms and Advance Them to a New Stage within the Priority Areas

of the Country’s Development until 2030” // National Database of Legislation. — February 17, 2026. — No.

/26/21/0145. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-8050769

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. O‘RQ-677 dated February 25, 2021, “On Auditing Activities” //

National Database of Legislation. — February 26, 2021. — No. 03/21/677/0155. https://lex.uz/docs/-

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Audit Sampling: Audit Guide. — New York: AICPA,

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., Hogan, C. E. Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated

Approach. — 17th ed. — Harlow: Pearson Education, 2020. — 841 p.

Christensen, B. E., Elder, R. J., Glover, S. M. Behind the Numbers: Insights into Large Audit Firm Sampling

Policies // Accounting Horizons. — 2015. — Vol. 29, No. 1. — P. 61–81. — DOI: 10.2308/acch-50921.

Elder, R. J., Akresh, A. D., Glover, S. M., Higgs, J. L., Liljegren, J. Audit Sampling Research: A Synthesis

and Implications for Future Research // Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. — 2013. — Vol. 32,

Supplement 1. — P. 99–129. — DOI: 10.2308/ajpt-50394.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. 2023–2024 Handbook of International Quality

Management, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. Vol. 1:

International Standards on Auditing and International Standards on Quality Management. ISA 530 “Audit

Sampling”. — New York: International Federation of Accountants, 2024.

International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. ISSAI 2530: Audit Sampling. — Vienna: INTOSAI,

International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. ISSAI 100: Fundamental Principles of Public-

Sector Auditing. — Vienna: INTOSAI, 2019.

Leslie, D. A., Teitlebaum, A. D., Anderson, R. J. Dollar-Unit Sampling: A Practical Guide for Auditors. —

Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman, 1979. — 409 p.

Neter, J., Loebbecke, J. K. Behavior of Major Statistical Estimators in Sampling Accounting Populations:

An Empirical Study. — New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 1975. — Auditing

Research Monograph No. 2.

Бычкова, С. М., Итыгилова, Е. Ю. Аудит: учебное пособие / под ред. Я. В. Соколова. — Москва:

Магистр, 2009. — 463 с.

Ганьшин, А. В. Совершенствование методов обоснования выборки в аудиторской проверке: дис.

… канд. экон. наук: 08.00.12. — Москва: Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской

Федерации, 2019. — 252 с.

Dosmuratov, R. D. Fundamentals of Auditing: Textbook. — Tashkent: Uzbekistan National Encyclopedia

State Scientific Publishing House, 2003. — 613 p.

Савин, А. А., Подольский, В. И. Аудит: учебник для академического бакалавриата. — 5-е изд.,

перераб. и доп. — Москва: Юрайт, 2018. — 455 с.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01