EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED BY CIVIL SOCIETY INSTITUTIONS USING PUBLIC FUNDS

Authors

  • Xusanova Gulsum Baxtiyorovna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21194295

Keywords:

civil society institutions; publicly funded projects; project effectiveness; state grants; government subsidies; social contracting; results-based management; social impact; institutional accountability; monitoring and evaluation; public finance; Uzbekistan; performance budgeting; transparency; evaluation criteria; NGO financing; public value; social partnership.

Abstract

This article examines methodological approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of publicly
funded projects implemented by civil society institutions. It develops an integrated results-based evaluation
framework that combines financial discipline, social impact, transparency, beneficiary coverage, sustainability,
and institutional accountability. The study reviews international evaluation standards alongside the ongoing
reform agenda in Uzbekistan and proposes practical mechanisms to strengthen evidence-based financing,
improve monitoring systems, and enhance the creation of public value.

Author Biography

Xusanova Gulsum Baxtiyorovna

Teacher, Department of Industrial Economics and Management,
Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology

References

Babayev, S. (2026). Legal basis of public funds in Uzbekistan. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences

and History.

International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. (2014). Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Social Partnership.

ICNL.

International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. (2025). Uzbekistan Civic Freedom Monitor. ICNL.

OECD. (2019). Learning from results-based management evaluations and reviews. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2021). Applying evaluation criteria thoughtfully. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2025). Government at a Glance 2025. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2025). Evaluation criteria: Relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and

sustainability. OECD.

United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Independent country programme evaluation: Uzbekistan.

UNDP.

United Nations Development Programme Uzbekistan. (2026). Uzbekistan launches new phase of GEF

Small Grants Programme to scale community-led environmental solutions. UNDP.

World Bank. (2024). Social accountability and public service delivery. World Bank.

World Bank. (2026). Civil society organizations: Partnerships and social accountability. World Bank

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01